INEWS-REPORT
Le
Prix
de
Nobel
d'Emmanuelle
Charpentier:
CRISPR/
CAS9
Emmanuelle
Charpentier:
"tres
emue"
de
recevoir
le
Nobel
de
chemie
|AFP
Why
did
Emmanuelle
Charpentier:
study
science?
Putin's
Russia
And
Soros
And
Pashiniyan's
Armenia
June 05 , 2021
The 4 March 2021 issue of the Greek City Times published an article entitled ">Pashiniyan maintains anti-Russia position despite Armenia’s abandonment from the West" written by
Paul Antonopoulos.
Source:
Greek
City
Times
|By
Paul
Antono
-poulos|
04
March
2021:
Pashinyan
maintains
anti-
Russia
position
despite
Armenia’s
abandonment
from
the
West
Paul Antonopoulos writes:
"A report by EurAsia Daily documented Pashinyan’s appointments after coming to power, especially those associated with NGO’s funded by famous Russophobe billionaire George Soros."
The author addresses:
"Effectively, Pashinyan gained popularity on the back of an anti-Russia campaign, adopting the methods used by Baltic states to pivot to the West and reject Moscow."
The writer explains:
" For Pashinyan and his supporters, the folly of their obsession in rejecting everything Russian and pivoting towards Atlanticist power structures, despite being in a very dangerous and volatile Caucasus, came to a shocking realization."
Mr. Antonopoulos writes:
"All efforts to pursue an anti-Russia agenda and move towards the West came to naught once the invasion began and the European Union, Washington and NATO were completely disinterested."
Source:
Greek
City
Times
|By
Paul
Antono
-poulos|
04
March
2021:
Pashinyan
maintains
anti-
Russia
position
despite
Armenia’s
abandonment
from
the
West
The author points out:
"In the end, it was Russia that ended the conflict whilst saving Armenian administration over the Soviet-era borders of Nagorno-Karabakh."
Mr. Antonopoulos states:
"However, with the political blowback because of his own incompetency, Pashinyan attempted to shift some of Armenia’s military failures onto Russia by falsely claiming that the Iskander system had only a 10% success rate."
The writer addresses:
"This suggests that despite Armenia having experienced a catastrophic loss only a few months ago after receiving no support from the West, Pashinyan has no interest in ending his country’s path towards Western liberalism and continues attacks against Moscow."
Source:
Greek
City
Times
|By
Paul
Antono
-poulos|
04
March
2021:
Pashinyan
maintains
anti-
Russia
position
despite
Armenia’s
abandonment
from
the
West
To Be
Situated
In
Moscow's
Zone
of Influence
19 Feb 2021
In May/June 2016 issue of Foreign Affairs, author Dmitri Vitalyevich Trenin (Дмитрий Витальевич Тренин) [the director of the Carnegie Moscow Center]
authored an article entitled "The Revival of Russian Military".
Mr. Trenin writes:
"After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Russian military rotted away."(p.23)
Mr. Trenin writes:
"Those days of decay and docility are now gone."(p.23)
The author addresses:
"Russia has recently evinced a newfound willingness to use force to get what it wants."(p.23)
The writer explains:
"First in February 2014, Moscow sent soldiers in unmarked uniforms to wrest control of Crimea from Ukraine, implicitly threatening Kiev with a wider invasion."(p.23)
"It then provided weaponry, intelligence, and command-and-control support to the pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine's Donbas region, cheking Kiev's attempts to defeat them," writes the author.(p.23)
Dimitry Trenin, the former colonel of Russian military intelligence writes:
In August 2008 Russian forces routed troops loyal to the pro Western president, Mikhaeil Saakashvilli, and secured the breakaway republics of
Abkhasia and South Ossetia as Russian protectrates."(p.24)
The author addresses:
"The five-day campaign was a clear success:Moscow prevented NATO from expanding into a former Soviet state that was flirting with membership, confirmed its strategic supremacy in its immediate southern and western neighborhood, and marked the limits of Western militarh involvement in the region."(p.24)
On June 2, 2014, Dimitry Vitalyovich Trenin (1955) authored an article entitled "Russia’s goal in Ukraine remains the same: Keep NATO out" published in the American Aljazeera's website "america.aljazeera.com".
Source:
Russia’s
goal
in Ukraine
remains
the
same:
Keep
NATO out"
Dimitri Trenin [who was the former colonel in the Russia military inteligence] talks about the Russian military invasion and the occupation of the Crimea as success!?
Mr. Trenin despite holding a PhD degree from a university, ignores the violation of the international law by Russia. He points out:
"First Crimea (with the port in Sevastopol) was secured and incorporated into the Russian Federation."
"Second, Moscow began mobilizing the notoriously passive 8 million ethnic Russians and many more Russophones in eastern and southern Ukraine, supporting local groups demanding a federal system for greater autonomy for regions stretching from Kharkov to Odessa."
Dimitri Trenin addresses:
"Russia’s strategic goals in Ukraine, of course, are broader than securely barring its NATO membership, but keeping Ukraine out of NATO is the first priority."
"Essentially, the Kremlin has been reacting to the threat of post-Maidan Ukraine’s joining NATO," the author addresses.
The author also explains:
"Having lost faith in the trustworthiness of the West and its assurances, Moscow is now busy creating facts on the ground that will make the country’s move toward NATO structurally impossible."
The JULY 31, 2017 issue of Foreign Policy publushed an article entitled
"If Putin Wanted to Step Up His Fight With America, You’d Know It" written by Dimitri Trenin.
Source:
If
Putin
Wanted
to
Step
Up
His
Fight
With
America,
You’d
Know
It
Dimitry Trenin writes:
"The Russian president has never been shy about venting his anger at those whom he considers Russia’s enemies in the United States, as he did last week on a visit to Finland, where he called the sanctions bill “unacceptable” and said it was “destroying international relations and international law.”
The author addresses:
"Trump’s election has also magnified the crisis in U.S. foreign policy that preceded him."
Mr. Trenin explains:
"For a former KGB officer like Putin, these are useful pieces of intelligence."
Source:
If
Putin
Wanted
to
Step
Up
His
Fight
With
America,
You’d
Know
It
Putin's
Aggression
Exposes
Russia's
Decline
23 Feb, 2021
On November 14, 2019 The Hill "thehill.com" published an article entitled "The analysts are wrong: Putin's aggression exposes Russia's decline" written by Marik.von Rennenkampff.
Source:
November
14,
2019
The
analysts
are
wrong:
Putin's
aggression
exposes
Russia's
decline
MARIK VON RENNENKAMPFF writes:
"Countless geopolitical analysts attribute increasing Russian aggression to Vladimir Putin's desire to reclaim Russian "greatness"."
The author explains:
"But a more nuanced assessment holds that, far from "resurrecting" the "Russian empire," Putin's provocations are symptoms of an isolated power in decline."
The writer addresses:
"In short, recent Russian bellicosity around the globe amounts to (a) propping up the few allies that Moscow has left or (b) lashing out when Russia loses (yet another) ally."
Mr. von Rennenkampff adds:
"Ultimately, Putin's increasingly belligerent behavior - to include Moscow's sweeping campaign to disrupt the 2016 U.S. elections - is a product of Russia's increasing isolation on the international stage."
The author states:
"After centuries of invasions - from Napoleon to Nazi Germany - the Russian strategic psyche remains staunchly suspicious of the West."
Source:
November
14,
2019
The
analysts
are
wrong:
Putin's
aggression
exposes
Russia's
decline
Russia's
Military
Aggression
In
Europe
23 Feb 2021
On Friday, April 14, 2017, The Security and Cooperation in Europe's website published an article entitled "Russian Military Aggression in Europe: A Resurgent Threat To Stability".
This article reflected a Helsinki Commission perspective on recent SAC hearings.
Source:
Russian
Military
Aggression
in
Europe:
A
Resurgent
Threat
To
Stability
The Helsinki Commission (The Commission for Security and Cooperation in Europe) presents its perspective about Russua's military aggression with following words
"The impact of Russia’s military aggression and its failure to uphold fundamental international agreements were of paramount importance to Helsinki Commission Chairman Senator Roger Wicker (MS), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Senator Jeanne Shaheen (NH), also a Helsinki Commissioner and a senior member of the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees."
The Commission addresses:
"Three key themes emerged in the Commissioners’ questioning:
the challenges Russian military activities, including exercises, pose to the stability of the European security environment;
Moscow’s flaunting of its security-related commitments;
and the role of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in addressing these violations.
Source:
Russian
Military
Aggression
in
Europe:
A
Resurgent
Threat
To
Stability
Rachel Bauman, policy officer in The Helsinki Commission (The Commission for Security and Cooperation in Europe in its Russia's website explains:
"Russia is failing repeatedly to live up to its commitments of the 1975 Helsinki Act, such as respecting territorial integrity, refraining from the threat or use of force, respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and fulfilling obligations under international law."
Source:
The
Hesinki
Commission's
Russia's
website
Rachel
Bauman,
policy
officer
in
CSCE
The Commission addresses:
"The Helsinki Commission is particularly concerned about Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, including its illegal occupation of Crimea and its ongo."
Source:
The
Hesinki
Commission's
Russia's
website
The
Liberation
of
Three-quarters
of
The occupied
Territories
In
44 Days
23 Feb 2021
On 23 Feb 2021 The Sport Info "sportinfo.as" published an article entitled "We expelled Harutyunyan from Shusha and we will expel him from Khankendi" written by Elbey Hasanli.
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli writes:
"The so-called NKR leader Araik Harutyunyan's organization of a "ceremony" in Khankendi on the occasion of the 33rd anniversary of the infamous Miatsum movement with the support of Russian peacekeepers has angered many in Azerbaijan."
The author adds:
"But wrongly. Araik Harutyunyan, who was elected "president" in May 2020, insulted the people of Azerbaijan and held his so-called "inauguration" in ancient Shusha. Not even a year."
The writer addresses:
"Now Ilham Aliyev is almost wandering around Karabakh, walking in Shusha, as if he is the real owner of the land."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli explains:
"Araik Harutyunyan said that we should move the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh from Stepanakert (Khankendi) to Shusha. What happened? "
The author asks:
"Was he able to move?"
The writer questions:
"Didn't the Azerbaijani Army demolish the building where he held his "swearing-in ceremony" in Shusha? "
Mr. Hasanli states:
"At that time, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief said in his address to the nation:
“He took the oath of office.
Where will he take the oath of office ?!
Will hold a mourning ceremony!
Now run and hide like a mouse and come out! ”"
Yes, now Araik Harutyunyan has appeared with the support of Russia.
But tomorrow he will run away again like a mouse.
"Relax."
The author addresses:
"This issue is over."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Mr. Hasanli explains:
"For Nagorno-Karabakh to become an independent state, the people of Azerbaijan must be divided and at least not have a civil war ..."
"Of course, in theory, anything is possible."
The writer points out:
"But I do not believe in such things."
Elbey Hasanli writes:
"This nation, united in the Patriotic War and turned into an iron fist, achieved a great victory over the Armenians."
The writer explains:
"At the very least, this factor reduces the probability of the nation's disintegration to zero."
Mr. Hasanli asks:
Did we just beat my Armenians?
The author addresses:
"In my opinion, the scale of this victory is much larger than many people think."
"It is no secret that the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group were with Armenia."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli explains:
"Recently, the President of Azerbaijan expressed this issue in an open text."
The writer adds:
"The Armenian press also paid attention to Ilham Aliyev's opinion:
"During the talks, the Armenians never wanted to return Lachin and Kalbajar regions to us."
The author writes:
"The main reason for the disagreement between the parties was this."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli states:
'Unfortunately, Armenia and several foreign sponsors wanted to return the five regions to Azerbaijan."
"Nagorno-Karabakh was gaining independence, and the Kalbajar and Lachin regions were forever under the control of Armenia, but I rejected this proposal."
The author asks:
"What does "Armenia and its several foreign sponsors" mean?"
The writer addresses:
"At least, this means that the plan was supported not by one, but by two states (of course, we are talking about a country with a special weight, or more precisely, we are talking about the countries of the OSCE Minsk Group).
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Mr. Hassnli points out:
"That is, they pressured Azerbaijan to give Kalbajar and Lachin to Armenia, and Nagorno-Karabakh must be an independent state."
He addresses:
"Undoubtedly, one of the countries supporting this plan is France."
The author questions:
"Which is the second?"
The writer questions:
"The United States or Russia?"
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli states:
"It is clear that the president cannot and should not say such things."
The author writes:
"Personally, I am sure that the United States and Russia have also given serious support to Armenia."
"Pay attention: USA, Russia and France."
The writer addresses:
"Each of these countries is the strongest in the Armenian diaspora in the world."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Mr. Hasanli adds:
"I do not think that these three countries, where the Armenian Diaspora is so strong, have become a real voice in the OSCE Minsk Group by coincidence."
"And that's not all."
The author raises the question:
"How did the Iranian authorities, inspired by the Shiite community, make Armenia less than the United States, Russia and France? "
The writer addresses:
"Armenians repeatedly write that Iran was the country that helped Armenia the most in the world."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli questions:
"What did Azerbaijan do?"
The author explains:
"Official Baku, which sided with Turkey, Pakistan and Israel , took action and liberated three-quarters of the occupied territories in 44 days."
The writer points out:
"If the war had lasted for 2-3 days, we would not have been able to find another Armenian, even if we had taken a lamp and walked all over Karabakh at noon."
Mr. Hasanli addresses:
"The whole world saw Azerbaijan's overwhelming advantage over Armenia."
The author raises the question:
"How many countries did Azerbaijan silence the United States, Russia, France, Iran ... in order to introduce its place to Armenia?"
He notes:
"History will answer such questions someday."
Mr. Hasanli states:
"What I do know is that it doesn't matter what you know or how much you know."
"What matters," the author writes, "is how much information you use to reach your goal."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Putin's Tactic:
In Ukraine
Known as
"Hybrid Warfare"
Is:
"Providing logistical and intelligence support for the pro Russian separatists"
In Donbas
"While undertaking military exercises near the Ukrainian border to keep Kiev off balance"
19 Feb 2021
In May/June 2016 issue of Foreign Affairs, author Dmitri Vitalyevich Trenin authored an article entitled "The Revival of Russian Military".
Mr.Trenin in his article points out:
"By increasing its military footprint in Abkhasia and South Ossetia, Russia also bolstered its control of two strategically important areas in Transcaucasia-securing the approach to Sochi, the location of Russian president's southern residence and Russia's informal third capital, in the former, and placing Russian forces within striking distance of Tibilisi in the latter."(p.24)
The author explains:
"Moscow won the war against a much weaker enemy, but the flaws in its military were too glaring to ignore."(p.24)
Mr. Trenin notes:
"The operation in Crimea was not a shooting war, but actual fighting followed a few weeks later in Donbas."(p.25)
"Instead of ordering a massive cross-border invasion of eastern Ukraine, which Moscow had implicitly threatened and Kiev feared, the Putin government resorted to a tactic known in the West as "hybrid warfare": providing logistical and intelligence support for the pro Russian separatists in the Donbas while undertaking military exercises near the Ukrainian border to keep Kiev off balance."(p.25)
Dimitri Trenin writes:
"Russia benefited from its Ukraine campaign in several ways."(p.26)
The author explains:
"The gambit allowed Moscow to incorporate Crimea, and it kept Kiev fearful of a full-scale invasion,which made the new Ukrainian leadership abandon the idea of using all.of the coyntry's available forces to suppress the separatist rebellion in the Donbas."(p.26)
Mr. Trenin addresses:
"It also directly challenged U.S. dominance in the region, terrifying some of Russia's neighbors, espwcially the Baltic states, which feared that Moscow might pull off similar operations in support of their own minority Russian populations."(p.26)
The writer points out:
"For all its novelties, the Rhssian offensive in Ukraine did not end Moscow's tendency to prohect force only within the borders of the former Soviet Union."(p.26)
"Russia broke that trend last year, when it dove intk Syria's civil war."((p.26)
Dimitri Trenin writes:
"Where will the Russian military go next? Moscow is looking to the Arctic, where the hasteninv retreat of sea ice is exposing rich energh deposirs and making commercial navigation more viable."(p.27)
The writer explains:
"In the coming years, then, Russia's military will continue to focus on the country's vast neighborhood in greater Euroasia, where Moscow believes using force constitutes strategic defense."(p.28)
I'm
Russian
occupant
Science
Daily|
7
May
2021:
New
Brain-
Like
Device
with
Electro-
chemical
Synaptic
Transistors
Simulates
Human
Learning
The Hindu
News
|07
May
U.K.
Advises
Under
40s
Get
Alternative
to
AstraZenka
The author addresses:
"Russia has recently evinced a newfound willingness to use force to get what it wants."(p.23)
The writer explains:
"First in February 2014, Moscow sent soldiers in unmarked uniforms to wrest control of Crimea from Ukraine, implicitly threatening Kiev with a wider invasion."(p.23)
"It then provided weaponry, intelligence, and command-and-control support to the pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine's Donbas region, cheking Kiev's attempts to defeat them," writes the author.(p.23)
Dimitry Trenin, the former colonel of Russian military intelligence writes:
In August 2008 Russian forces routed troops loyal to the pro Western president, Mikhaeil Saakashvilli, and secured the breakaway republics of
Abkhasia and South Ossetia as Russian protectrates."(p.24)
The author addresses:
"The five-day campaign was a clear success:Moscow prevented NATO from expanding into a former Soviet state that was flirting with membership, confirmed its strategic supremacy in its immediate southern and western neighborhood, and marked the limits of Western militarh involvement in the region."(p.24)
On June 2, 2014, Dimitry Vitalyovich Trenin (1955) authored an article entitled "Russia’s goal in Ukraine remains the same: Keep NATO out" published in the American Aljazeera's website "america.aljazeera.com".
Source:
Russia’s
goal
in Ukraine
remains
the
same:
Keep
NATO out"
Dimitri Trenin [who was the former colonel in the Russia military inteligence] talks about the Russian military invasion and the occupation of the Crimea as success!?
Mr. Trenin despite holding a PhD degree from a university, ignores the violation of the international law by Russia. He points out:
"First Crimea (with the port in Sevastopol) was secured and incorporated into the Russian Federation."
"Second, Moscow began mobilizing the notoriously passive 8 million ethnic Russians and many more Russophones in eastern and southern Ukraine, supporting local groups demanding a federal system for greater autonomy for regions stretching from Kharkov to Odessa."
Dimitri Trenin addresses:
"Russia’s strategic goals in Ukraine, of course, are broader than securely barring its NATO membership, but keeping Ukraine out of NATO is the first priority."
"Essentially, the Kremlin has been reacting to the threat of post-Maidan Ukraine’s joining NATO," the author addresses.
The author also explains:
"Having lost faith in the trustworthiness of the West and its assurances, Moscow is now busy creating facts on the ground that will make the country’s move toward NATO structurally impossible."
The JULY 31, 2017 issue of Foreign Policy publushed an article entitled
"If Putin Wanted to Step Up His Fight With America, You’d Know It" written by Dimitri Trenin.
Source:
If
Putin
Wanted
to
Step
Up
His
Fight
With
America,
You’d
Know
It
Dimitry Trenin writes:
"The Russian president has never been shy about venting his anger at those whom he considers Russia’s enemies in the United States, as he did last week on a visit to Finland, where he called the sanctions bill “unacceptable” and said it was “destroying international relations and international law.”
The author addresses:
"Trump’s election has also magnified the crisis in U.S. foreign policy that preceded him."
Mr. Trenin explains:
"For a former KGB officer like Putin, these are useful pieces of intelligence."
Source:
If
Putin
Wanted
to
Step
Up
His
Fight
With
America,
You’d
Know
It
Putin's
Aggression
Exposes
Russia's
Decline
23 Feb, 2021
On November 14, 2019 The Hill "thehill.com" published an article entitled "The analysts are wrong: Putin's aggression exposes Russia's decline" written by Marik.von Rennenkampff.
Source:
November
14,
2019
The
analysts
are
wrong:
Putin's
aggression
exposes
Russia's
decline
MARIK VON RENNENKAMPFF writes:
"Countless geopolitical analysts attribute increasing Russian aggression to Vladimir Putin's desire to reclaim Russian "greatness"."
The author explains:
"But a more nuanced assessment holds that, far from "resurrecting" the "Russian empire," Putin's provocations are symptoms of an isolated power in decline."
The writer addresses:
"In short, recent Russian bellicosity around the globe amounts to (a) propping up the few allies that Moscow has left or (b) lashing out when Russia loses (yet another) ally."
Mr. von Rennenkampff adds:
"Ultimately, Putin's increasingly belligerent behavior - to include Moscow's sweeping campaign to disrupt the 2016 U.S. elections - is a product of Russia's increasing isolation on the international stage."
The author states:
"After centuries of invasions - from Napoleon to Nazi Germany - the Russian strategic psyche remains staunchly suspicious of the West."
Source:
November
14,
2019
The
analysts
are
wrong:
Putin's
aggression
exposes
Russia's
decline
Russia's
Military
Aggression
In
Europe
23 Feb 2021
On Friday, April 14, 2017, The Security and Cooperation in Europe's website published an article entitled "Russian Military Aggression in Europe: A Resurgent Threat To Stability".
This article reflected a Helsinki Commission perspective on recent SAC hearings.
Source:
Russian
Military
Aggression
in
Europe:
A
Resurgent
Threat
To
Stability
The Helsinki Commission (The Commission for Security and Cooperation in Europe) presents its perspective about Russua's military aggression with following words
"The impact of Russia’s military aggression and its failure to uphold fundamental international agreements were of paramount importance to Helsinki Commission Chairman Senator Roger Wicker (MS), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Senator Jeanne Shaheen (NH), also a Helsinki Commissioner and a senior member of the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees."
The Commission addresses:
"Three key themes emerged in the Commissioners’ questioning:
the challenges Russian military activities, including exercises, pose to the stability of the European security environment;
Moscow’s flaunting of its security-related commitments;
and the role of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in addressing these violations.
Source:
Russian
Military
Aggression
in
Europe:
A
Resurgent
Threat
To
Stability
Rachel Bauman, policy officer in The Helsinki Commission (The Commission for Security and Cooperation in Europe in its Russia's website explains:
"Russia is failing repeatedly to live up to its commitments of the 1975 Helsinki Act, such as respecting territorial integrity, refraining from the threat or use of force, respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and fulfilling obligations under international law."
Source:
The
Hesinki
Commission's
Russia's
website
Rachel
Bauman,
policy
officer
in
CSCE
The Commission addresses:
"The Helsinki Commission is particularly concerned about Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, including its illegal occupation of Crimea and its ongo."
Source:
The
Hesinki
Commission's
Russia's
website
The
Liberation
of
Three-quarters
of
The occupied
Territories
In
44 Days
23 Feb 2021
On 23 Feb 2021 The Sport Info "sportinfo.as" published an article entitled "We expelled Harutyunyan from Shusha and we will expel him from Khankendi" written by Elbey Hasanli.
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli writes:
"The so-called NKR leader Araik Harutyunyan's organization of a "ceremony" in Khankendi on the occasion of the 33rd anniversary of the infamous Miatsum movement with the support of Russian peacekeepers has angered many in Azerbaijan."
The author adds:
"But wrongly. Araik Harutyunyan, who was elected "president" in May 2020, insulted the people of Azerbaijan and held his so-called "inauguration" in ancient Shusha. Not even a year."
The writer addresses:
"Now Ilham Aliyev is almost wandering around Karabakh, walking in Shusha, as if he is the real owner of the land."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli explains:
"Araik Harutyunyan said that we should move the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh from Stepanakert (Khankendi) to Shusha. What happened? "
The author asks:
"Was he able to move?"
The writer questions:
"Didn't the Azerbaijani Army demolish the building where he held his "swearing-in ceremony" in Shusha? "
Mr. Hasanli states:
"At that time, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief said in his address to the nation:
“He took the oath of office.
Where will he take the oath of office ?!
Will hold a mourning ceremony!
Now run and hide like a mouse and come out! ”"
Yes, now Araik Harutyunyan has appeared with the support of Russia.
But tomorrow he will run away again like a mouse.
"Relax."
The author addresses:
"This issue is over."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Mr. Hasanli explains:
"For Nagorno-Karabakh to become an independent state, the people of Azerbaijan must be divided and at least not have a civil war ..."
"Of course, in theory, anything is possible."
The writer points out:
"But I do not believe in such things."
Elbey Hasanli writes:
"This nation, united in the Patriotic War and turned into an iron fist, achieved a great victory over the Armenians."
The writer explains:
"At the very least, this factor reduces the probability of the nation's disintegration to zero."
Mr. Hasanli asks:
Did we just beat my Armenians?
The author addresses:
"In my opinion, the scale of this victory is much larger than many people think."
"It is no secret that the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group were with Armenia."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli explains:
"Recently, the President of Azerbaijan expressed this issue in an open text."
The writer adds:
"The Armenian press also paid attention to Ilham Aliyev's opinion:
"During the talks, the Armenians never wanted to return Lachin and Kalbajar regions to us."
The author writes:
"The main reason for the disagreement between the parties was this."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli states:
'Unfortunately, Armenia and several foreign sponsors wanted to return the five regions to Azerbaijan."
"Nagorno-Karabakh was gaining independence, and the Kalbajar and Lachin regions were forever under the control of Armenia, but I rejected this proposal."
The author asks:
"What does "Armenia and its several foreign sponsors" mean?"
The writer addresses:
"At least, this means that the plan was supported not by one, but by two states (of course, we are talking about a country with a special weight, or more precisely, we are talking about the countries of the OSCE Minsk Group).
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Mr. Hassnli points out:
"That is, they pressured Azerbaijan to give Kalbajar and Lachin to Armenia, and Nagorno-Karabakh must be an independent state."
He addresses:
"Undoubtedly, one of the countries supporting this plan is France."
The author questions:
"Which is the second?"
The writer questions:
"The United States or Russia?"
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli states:
"It is clear that the president cannot and should not say such things."
The author writes:
"Personally, I am sure that the United States and Russia have also given serious support to Armenia."
"Pay attention: USA, Russia and France."
The writer addresses:
"Each of these countries is the strongest in the Armenian diaspora in the world."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Mr. Hasanli adds:
"I do not think that these three countries, where the Armenian Diaspora is so strong, have become a real voice in the OSCE Minsk Group by coincidence."
"And that's not all."
The author raises the question:
"How did the Iranian authorities, inspired by the Shiite community, make Armenia less than the United States, Russia and France? "
The writer addresses:
"Armenians repeatedly write that Iran was the country that helped Armenia the most in the world."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli questions:
"What did Azerbaijan do?"
The author explains:
"Official Baku, which sided with Turkey, Pakistan and Israel , took action and liberated three-quarters of the occupied territories in 44 days."
The writer points out:
"If the war had lasted for 2-3 days, we would not have been able to find another Armenian, even if we had taken a lamp and walked all over Karabakh at noon."
Mr. Hasanli addresses:
"The whole world saw Azerbaijan's overwhelming advantage over Armenia."
The author raises the question:
"How many countries did Azerbaijan silence the United States, Russia, France, Iran ... in order to introduce its place to Armenia?"
He notes:
"History will answer such questions someday."
Mr. Hasanli states:
"What I do know is that it doesn't matter what you know or how much you know."
"What matters," the author writes, "is how much information you use to reach your goal."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
"The so-called NKR leader Araik Harutyunyan's organization of a "ceremony" in Khankendi on the occasion of the 33rd anniversary of the infamous Miatsum movement with the support of Russian peacekeepers has angered many in Azerbaijan."
The author adds:
"But wrongly. Araik Harutyunyan, who was elected "president" in May 2020, insulted the people of Azerbaijan and held his so-called "inauguration" in ancient Shusha. Not even a year."
The writer addresses:
"Now Ilham Aliyev is almost wandering around Karabakh, walking in Shusha, as if he is the real owner of the land."
Source:
We
expelled
Harutyunyan
from
Shusha
and
we
will
expel
him
from
Khankendi
Elbey Hasanli explains:
"Araik Harutyunyan said that we should move the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh from Stepanakert (Khankendi) to Shusha. What happened? "
The author asks:
"Was he able to move?"
The writer questions:
"Didn't the Azerbaijani Army demolish the building where he held his "swearing-in ceremony" in Shusha? "
Mr. Hasanli states:Where will he take the oath of office ?!
Will hold a mourning ceremony!
Now run and hide like a mouse and come out! ”" Yes, now Araik Harutyunyan has appeared with the support of Russia.
But tomorrow he will run away again like a mouse.
Putin's Tactic:
In Ukraine
Known as
"Hybrid Warfare"
Is:
"Providing logistical and intelligence support for the pro Russian separatists"
In Donbas
"While undertaking military exercises near the Ukrainian border to keep Kiev off balance"
19 Feb 2021
In May/June 2016 issue of Foreign Affairs, author Dmitri Vitalyevich Trenin authored an article entitled "The Revival of Russian Military".
Mr.Trenin in his article points out:
"By increasing its military footprint in Abkhasia and South Ossetia, Russia also bolstered its control of two strategically important areas in Transcaucasia-securing the approach to Sochi, the location of Russian president's southern residence and Russia's informal third capital, in the former, and placing Russian forces within striking distance of Tibilisi in the latter."(p.24)
The author explains:
"Moscow won the war against a much weaker enemy, but the flaws in its military were too glaring to ignore."(p.24)
Mr. Trenin notes:
"The operation in Crimea was not a shooting war, but actual fighting followed a few weeks later in Donbas."(p.25)
"Instead of ordering a massive cross-border invasion of eastern Ukraine, which Moscow had implicitly threatened and Kiev feared, the Putin government resorted to a tactic known in the West as "hybrid warfare": providing logistical and intelligence support for the pro Russian separatists in the Donbas while undertaking military exercises near the Ukrainian border to keep Kiev off balance."(p.25)
Dimitri Trenin writes:
"Russia benefited from its Ukraine campaign in several ways."(p.26)
The author explains:
"The gambit allowed Moscow to incorporate Crimea, and it kept Kiev fearful of a full-scale invasion,which made the new Ukrainian leadership abandon the idea of using all.of the coyntry's available forces to suppress the separatist rebellion in the Donbas."(p.26)
Mr. Trenin addresses:
"It also directly challenged U.S. dominance in the region, terrifying some of Russia's neighbors, espwcially the Baltic states, which feared that Moscow might pull off similar operations in support of their own minority Russian populations."(p.26)
The writer points out:
"For all its novelties, the Rhssian offensive in Ukraine did not end Moscow's tendency to prohect force only within the borders of the former Soviet Union."(p.26)
"Russia broke that trend last year, when it dove intk Syria's civil war."((p.26)
Dimitri Trenin writes:
"Where will the Russian military go next? Moscow is looking to the Arctic, where the hasteninv retreat of sea ice is exposing rich energh deposirs and making commercial navigation more viable."(p.27)
The writer explains:
"In the coming years, then, Russia's military will continue to focus on the country's vast neighborhood in greater Euroasia, where Moscow believes using force constitutes strategic defense."(p.28)
I'm
Russian
occupant
Science
Daily|
7
May
2021:
New
Brain-
Like
Device
with
Electro-
chemical
Synaptic
Transistors
Simulates
Human
Learning
The Hindu
News
|07
May
U.K.
Advises
Under
40s
Get
Alternative
to
AstraZenka
No comments:
Post a Comment